Friday, January 6, 2012

Rick Santorum Booed Off Stage in New Hampshire

Concord, NH - As most free thinking American Citizens knows by now, former Senator and GOP Presidential candidate Rick Santorum is a Fox News plant thrown into the ring by Rupert Murdoch himself.  Disgraced Murdoch was even tweeting for Santorum in the days leading up to the Iowa caucus.

Although Santorum did make a case in Iowa, visiting more than 300 cities to gain his seven delegates in Iowa's caucus, it's obvious that the Citizens of New Hampshire have caught on to this Obama Clone, just as Bush and Obama are the same puppet clones, simply wearing different clothing.

It what I can call amusing at best, Santorum was voted the most corrupt politician in 2008, and just today, he was booed off the stage at a speaking event in Concord after making fun of the plight of gays rights to marry, seeking their own pursuit of happiness.


In Rick Santorum's hatefully shameful, very dark closet homosexual world, denying gays the liberties that all human being deserve, got him booed off stage today.  Priceless.

In a victory lap for the human rights movement, I applaud the Citizens of of New Hampshire for standing up for all people.  I wish I could say that about the rest of this great nation.

By:  Brent Bateman

What Happened to the Men Who Signed the Declaration of Independence

Los Angeles, CA - Have you ever wondered what happened to the 56 men who signed the Declaration of Independence? Five signers were captured by the British as traitors, and tortured before they died.

Twelve had their homes ransacked and burned. Two lost their sons serving in the Revolutionary Army; another had two sons captured.  Nine of the 56 fought and died from wounds or hardships of the Revolutionary War. They signed and they pledged their lives, their fortunes, and their sacred honor. 

What kind of men were they? Twenty-four were lawyers and jurists. Eleven were merchants, nine were farmers and large plantation owners; men of means, well educated. But they signed the Declaration of Independence knowing full well that the penalty would be death if they were captured. 

Carter Braxton of Virginia, a wealthy planter and trader, saw his ships swept from the seas by the British Navy. He sold his home and properties to pay his debts, and died in rags. Thomas McKeam was so hounded by the British that he was forced to move his family almost constantly. He served in the Congress without pay, and his family was kept in hiding. His possessions were taken from him, and poverty was his reward. 

Vandals or soldiers looted the properties of Dillery, Hall, Clymer, Walton, Gwinnett, Heyward, Ruttledge, and Middleton. At the battle of Yorktown, Thomas Nelson, Jr. noted that the British General Cornwallis had taken over the Nelson home for his headquarters. He quietly urged General George Washington to open fire. The home was destroyed, and Nelson died bankrupt. 

Francis Lewis had his home and properties destroyed. The enemy jailed his wife, and she died within a few months. John Hart was driven from his wife's bedside as she was dying. Their 13 children fled for their lives. His fields and his gristmill were laid to waste. For more than a year he lived in forests and caves, returning home to find his wife dead and his children vanished. A few weeks later, he died from exhaustion and a broken heart. Norris and Livingston suffered similar fates. 

Such were the stories and sacrifices of the American Revolution. These were not wild-eyed, rabble-rousing ruffians. They were soft-spoken men of means and education. They had security, but they valued liberty more. Let us reflect upon the sacrifices our Forefathers made for us, and then ask ourselves, "What am I doing to save my country for future generations?"

 Are you doing all you can do to stand up and fight for your country, or are you just sitting there hoping someone else will step up and save your worthless self???

By:  Newswire

Wednesday, January 4, 2012

Top CIA Expert Endorses Ron Paul for President

Los Angeles, CA - The former head of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) unit tracking terror leader Osama bin Laden, Michael Scheuer (left), endorsed Republican Rep. Ron Paul of Texas for President in 2012, days before the Iowa caucus. He argued, among other points, that the top-tier GOP hopeful is the best candidate to protect America from violent Islamic extremism.

Michael Scheuer
In a column entitled "Iowa’s Choice: Dr. Paul or U.S. bankruptcy, more wars, and many more dead soldiers and Marines" published on his website over the weekend, Scheuer said voting for any candidate other than Paul would help inflict further damage on an already-wounded America. It would also contribute toward the continuation of a foreign policy that will ensure total national bankruptcy, noted the 22-year intelligence-community veteran, who now serves as an adjunct professor at Georgetown University’s Center for Peace and Security Studies.                                                                                                       

“Dr. Paul’s non-interventionist policy will allow foreigners to work out their political destiny in their own way and at their own pace; prevent unnecessary additions to America’s growing list of enemies; and save countless young lives,” Scheuer wrote in his endorsement, blasting senior leaders and lawmakers on both sides of the aisle with harsh words. “Electing anyone but Ron Paul will further increase the already strong chances of widespread Islamist-conducted violence inside the United States.”

Scheuer, who has authored several books criticizing U.S. foreign policy, emphasized the fact that Paul’s campaign has received far more donations from the American military than all other Republican candidates combined. He also lambasted establishment talking heads and politicians for improperly mischaracterizing the 12-term GOP Congressman’s non-interventionist views, pointing again to his strong support among members of the armed services.

According to Scheuer’s analysis, Paul is the only presidential candidate who would truly push for cuts in American militarism as well as out-of-control domestic spending. And any other candidate — Obama included — would continue to unconstitutionally squander U.S. taxpayer money promoting feminism, “elitist democracy,” and “mindless anarchy” around the world, the counter-terror expert asserted.

On top of that, Scheuer said, all of the presidential contenders except Paul would continue to “slavishly obey” lobbyists in the drive to start a war with Iran. And it would be an unmitigated tragedy for Americans.

“Such a war would be a financial and military disaster for the United States, and would be watched with glee by Russian and Chinese leaders who — while their countries would lose some trade with Iran during a war — would applaud another U.S. self-inflicted wound that further erodes the already failing economy that is the base of American power,” Scheuer wrote in his endorsement.

The broader bipartisan foreign policy of the last several decades will continue unabated if any other contender becomes President, Scheuer also explained. And it will have predictable consequences: more resources wasted, more Muslims taking up arms against America, and possibly even the beginning of a disastrous “clash of civilizations.”

“Notwithstanding the damnable lies about Dr. Paul’s foreign policy … only the gentleman from Texas speaks for the Founders’ non-interventionist vision of America’s role in world affairs and for plain common sense,” Scheuer argued. “In the Founders’ non-interventionist design for U.S. foreign policy that is championed by Dr. Paul, Iowans will find a proven road to the maintenance of America’s sovereignty, independence, peace, and prosperity. In the realm of common sense, Dr. Paul beats his fellow candidates, the Obamaites, and the media hands down.”

In the long and detailed piece endorsing Ron Paul, Scheuer also accused Obama and Paul’s fellow GOP contenders of lying about the true motivations of Islamists in waging a war on America. He said that, contrary to the bipartisan narrative, Muslim extremists attack American interests because of U.S. government meddling abroad — not because they hate Americans’ liberties or gender-equality laws.

And on issues such as energy independence, Ron Paul is also the best candidate, Scheuer argued. “Only Dr. Paul could be counted on to allow the unfettered development of all domestic energy resources to promote energy self-sufficiency and allow the gradual abandonment of our mujahedin-motivating exploitation of Muslim oil,” he wrote.

Scheuer warned about looming troubles coming to American streets, too — assuming something does not change soon. According to the expert on Islamic terrorism, continuing the same policies could very well lead to America becoming a battlefield — a situation that would likely result in having to use the military on U.S. soil. Paul and the policies he advocates, Scheuer said, offer the best hope for preventing such a calamity.

“Indeed, the national-security policy advocated by Dr. Paul’s opponents and critics boils down to the clear and absurd argument that: America needs more and more wars — and the dead/maimed military personnel attendant thereto — that are motivated by Washington’s intervention abroad if Americans are to be safe and secure at home,” Scheuer concluded. “For Iowans and Americans as a whole, then, the best choice for their children, grandchildren, and country clearly lies in the Founders’ foreign-policy wisdom and Dr. Paul’s sturdy advocacy and promised application thereof.”

So far, neo-conservatives and most of the establishment media have largely ignored Scheuer’s powerful endorsement of Ron Paul and his views. By January 3, only the Des Moines Register and U.S. News & World Report had even mentioned the announcement.

But Paul’s campaign was thankful nonetheless. “We’re pleased to have the endorsement of Michael Scheuer, who is the world’s leading expert on the notorious terrorist Osama bin Laden and who like Ron Paul understands the connection between U.S. military adventurism and emerging threats against America,” said Ron Paul campaign chairman Jesse Benton.

“Michael Scheuer understands that only Dr. Paul will put our national security first and stop the foreign wars and nation building,” Benton concluded. “Our campaign is very proud to have his support.”

By: Alex Newman

Rick Santorum Against ALL Abortions, Except for His Wife's Partial Birth Abortion

Los Angeles, CA - Senator Rick Santorum, not to be confused with the neologism coined by Dan Savagemeaning “a frothy mixture of lube and fecal matter sometimes the byproduct of anal sex”, is publicly very much against abortions, especially “partial birth abortions” where the baby is terminated any time after three or four weeks and has to be passed out of the woman’s body via the birth canal. Basically meaning any abortion. 

The description I’ve given is in no way an exaggeration or a falsehood, and the whole point of the term “partial birth” is to demonize the concept of abortion out of hand, making it seem like you’re giving birth to a viable human baby then stabbing it in the heart before it’s out the door. It’s a dirty tactic, but one in line with Santorum’s namesake neologism, certainly.

Santorum’s views are unapologetically black-and-white. He advocates that any doctor performing an abortion under any circumstances should be criminally charged.

Even for rape. Even for incest. Even for saving the mother’s life. None of them justify abortion in Rick Santorum’s world.

Unless it happens to be Rick Santorum’s wife, and she might have died if not for her 20-week-old fetus being “partial birth” aborted. That’s different. Because, you know, that’s JUSTIFIED. Unlike all those other mothers.

In October, 1996, his wife Karen had a second trimester abortion. They don’t like to describe it that way. In his 2004 interview with Terry Gross, Santorum characterizes the fetus, who must be treated as an autonomous person, as a practically a gunslinging threat, whom the mother must murder in self-defense. Karen has had to justify her decision to save her own life by explaining that if she died her other children would have lost a mother.


Karen Santorum is the wife of right-wing, anti-abortion Senator Rick Santorum (R-Pa.). In 1996, Senator Santorum led the debate on a bill that attempted to ban late-term abortions, and refused to make an exception even in the case of “grievous bodily injury” to the woman. In Santorum’s article, she expresses her view that carrying a non-viable fetus to term is the only option, and apparently does not think the woman’s health or future fertility should be a consideration.

I hereby call on Rick Santorum to sue the doctor who performed the surgery that saved his wife’s life. While it may not be a criminal act yet, at least you can get damages from the doctor for daring to save your wife’s life at the expense of your wife’s constitutionally endowed infection source. That act was a second-trimester abortion. It was a “partial birth abortion”. It was done only to save your wife’s life. It is done generally only to save other mothers’ lives. It is not a criminal act in any respect. If you do not sue this doctor, you are a hypocrite of the highest order, and deserving of the worst epithets people can Google-bomb you with.

Choosing abortion is not an easy choice to make. Sometimes, it’s the only option. People do not have abortions out of hand, despite what right-wingers and religious nuts would have you believe. Oftentimes, choosing abortion is choosing life — for the mother, who is often also the mother of other children.

Do not legislate that their wombs become pressganged into being baby factories for rapists or a death sentence for the womb’s owner. Trust doctors, and trust women, to make the choice only when necessary. If you don’t like abortion, then simply don’t have one, even if it costs you your life and your children their mother. And if you aren’t a woman or a doctor, shut the fuck up and stay the fuck out of the argument altogether. Especially if the reasons you’re horning in on this conversation — the reasons you believe you have any moral say in the matter whatsoever — have anything to do with a really old book.

By: Jason Thibeault

Obama Calls for Violence and Hand to Hand Combat If He Loses the Election

Los Angeles, CA -  The great “uniter” is at it again with his masterful use of words to “energize” his base before elections. Let’s see how the base is getting “energized.” Earlier Obama told members of the Black Caucus “We must guard the change.”

After that we had a few more people getting beat up at political rallies by thugs. We have a DOJ whistleblower saying the administration plans on massive voter fraud, a massive investigation of voter fraud in Houstonhappening right now, and the Obama administration is also being investigated for using confidential taxpayer information in an effort to attack a political opponent. Sounds like they were already “energized” enough.

Now the President of “change” tells Michael Baisden’s syndicated radio show that if Republicans take over it will mean “hand-to-hand combat” to keep the policies we Democrats enacted. Really?? If the “will of the people” vote out the Democrats, it’s because of your policies…. Just like you and the Liberals said when you were voted in. Only now many people are seeing how radical you are, and they didn’t vote for that.

Obama also made a direct appeal to African Americans about the importance of the November vote using the same old line: “Everybody in the barbershops, the beauty shops, and at work — everybody’s got to understand: This is a huge election,” He must have a lot of supporters that love barber and beauty shops.

Obama also needed to get the “blame Bush” defense in when he said “most of the job losses” his administration gets blamed for occurred before “any of my economic plans were put into place,” and that the country is still “‘experiencing the hangover from the misguided policies’ of the last decade.”

By:  Newswire

How Ron Paul Really Won the Iowa Caucus

Des Moines, IA - Although the Zionist controlled media of the United States continues to pretend Ron Paul still does not matter, here's a few things to ponder after last night's Iowa Caucus.

With the Iowa Caucus, the Paul campaign was smart enough to inform their voters to become delegates at the end of the Caucus vote.  In most of the counties Ron Paul took, all of the delegates are his supporters, as well as all of the alternates.

Enter Delegate count.  With a three way tie going into New Hampshire, we know the shameful homosexual Anderson Cooper and the Zionist lobbyist Wolf Blitzer keep forgetting to tell their fleabagging audience...The delegates can change their mind and vote for anyone at the convention.

Translation.  Ron Paul wins Iowa.  If you look at the most support coming to the Ron Paul campaign, you will notice that Paul picked up nearly 60% of all independents and former Democrats who cannot stomach the filthy Muslim usurper-in-thief, Barry Soetoro.

I cannot wait to see the look on all of these treasonous propaganda shows on the air when they have to address Ron Paul as Mr. President.

The Revolution has arrived.

By:  Brent Bateman

Tuesday, January 3, 2012

Quad City Pictures Releases Ron Paul T-Shirt Line

Los Angeles, CA - In light of the recent surge in poll numbers nationwide for Texas Congressman Ron Paul in the Republican Presidential primaries, Los Angeles based production company Quad City Pictures, has released a line of T-Shirts that are sure to capture his monumental presidential bid in this historical election year.

Quad City Pictures is currently in negotiations to released its documentary film, Fraud, an explosive and shocking feature that exposes the truth of the Barry Soetoro fraud, along with the crimes Barack Hussein Obama has committed, with the help of the entire United Stated Federal government.

"Ron Paul is the only person who is not controlled by the Zionists Hebrews of Israel.  In Hollywood, you are blacklisted for saying these kinds of things, but it's true.  The whole world is waking up to the Fraud, the treasonous media, and the rest of the criminals stealing our money.  Wait until November.  Ron Paul is going to win the Presidency and we can restore America together," says Quad City Pictures Brent Bateman.



By:  Newswire